audioReviewed 2026-08-08

WAV vs FLAC

Uncompressed WAV versus lossless FLAC for masters, archives, and editing.

Practical notes

Both preserve audio perfectly; FLAC usually saves about half the storage.

WAV has the widest DAW and hardware compatibility for short clips.

Criteria
WAV
FLAC
File size & compression
Uncompressed
Lossless
Transparency
Not applicable
Not applicable
Animation
Not applicable
Not applicable
Editing
Full sample-level editing
Full editing with lossless round-trip
Openness
Open
Open
Browser support
Universal
Most modern browsers
Typical uses
Audio mastering, Speech samples, DAW exports, Short broadcast clips
Music archives, Lossless streaming, Audiophile libraries, Archival audio masters
Limitations
Very large files, No compression by default, Less practical for music libraries
Larger than lossy files, Older hardware support varies, Metadata support is not universal

Attribute values come from the reviewed records on each format page.Read the methodology for source and review rules.

Use-case verdicts

Winners are conditional. A format wins only when the stated condition matches your workflow.

ArchivingFLAC

Lossless with smaller files

FLAC preserves audio losslessly at roughly half the size of WAV.

EditingDepends

Both are lossless masters

Choose WAV for DAW compatibility or FLAC for storage.

Sharing & deliveryWAV

Short clips or compatibility-first delivery

WAV opens in nearly every audio application.